But I know that all being takes off its origin of it, if it is well of sombras' ' . After that of the emphasis to the limits of the thought. In which if it treats in educating, therefore when more it is educated little if understands the fog that cause fear and that makes to shine the night and is in this then that consists the mstica in Morin, based in the knowledge: I feel ' ' misticamente' ' the moment in which the knowledge it discharges in the ignorance, in which knowing discharges in the mystery. At the same time, rationally I am convinced of that, when, but our science advances, but it comes close itself to the Inconhecvel. But I do not give to this Inconhecvel the name of God. Here, still, I join my demon of the rationality with the one of the mstica. We can observe that the author if feels mstico when the knowledge discharges in the ignorance.

This means that from the moment that if believes that it knows, but in the end if it knows and then it meets with the ignorance and it makes with that knowing if chains with the mystery. Morin affirms that science is advancing and this advance leads for the Inconhecvel, that is, walks for what it is not known. But it leaves clearly that this Inconhecvel is not God. Finally it declares that its thought still is in conflict with the mstica. It believes that this is bad when demon of the rationality, therefore creates an obstacle to come close itself to the misticismo. With this we can say that the mstica is not only exclusive of the religion. Edgar Morin says that the mstico phenomenon is not monopoly of the classic religions, the ones that claim the existence of God. affirms: It exists, also, in the secular religions.